Prosocial Behaviors Response and Questions

Prosocial Behaviors Response and Questions

Course Code PSY-362 Class Code PSY-362-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 90.0% Part I: Purpose of website/movement is discussed, including what story/stories were influential and why. 10.0% Part II: Describe your implementation of kindness, what did you do, how did you approach the idea, where did you implement it and to whom? 20.0% Describe the reactions you perceive from others and yourself. 20.0% Describe what you learn about prosocial behavior from this exercise. Compare the actual application of the behavior relative to this topic material. 20.0% If you are a faith-based person, explain how your faith helped you implement your helping behavior. If you are not a faith-based person, explain what philosophy, belief system, or values you connected to helping behavior. 20.0% Organization and Effectiveness 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Prosocial Behavior-Online Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Purpose of website/movement is discussed, including what story/stories were influential and why are missing. Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is missing. Description of reactions is missing. Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is missing. Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is missing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Sources are not documented. Total Points 60.0 Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Purpose of website/movement is discussed, including what story/stories were influential and why are vague and inconsistent. Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is vague or inadequate. Description of reactions is vague or inadequate. Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is vague or inadequate. Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is vague or inadequate. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (75.00%) Purpose of website/movement is discussed, including what story/stories were influential and why are present. Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is adequate. Description of reactions is adequate. Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is adequate. Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is adequate. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (85.00%) Purpose of website/movement is discussed, including what story/stories were influential and why are present and clear. Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is clear. Description of reactions is clear.